Kiribati places in Tier 4 of the ITU Global Cybersecurity Index 2024 — an evolving posture with limited public evidence of structured implementation. No comprehensive data-protection statute is yet in force, and no designated supervisory authority is publicly identified in the IAPP Global Privacy Directory at this Edition. On the question of artificial intelligence policy, no national AI policy is yet registered in the OECD AI Policy Observatory; on the question of open-government practice, Kiribati is not currently an Open Government Partnership member. Domestic data-center capacity is not currently surveyed by the Cushman & Wakefield and CBRE datasets at a level sufficient for ranking, and foundational digital identity coverage is not yet captured at a measurable level by the World Bank ID4D dataset.
With a composite of 15.5 out of 100, Kiribati sits at rank 174th out of the 194 States surveyed in Edition 0, in the lower band of the distribution. At this Edition the Custodian's open-source coverage is thinner for Kiribati than for many comparators; the assigned tier — Tier D — reflects evidence available, not an institutional verdict on the country's intentions. The pillar profile shows the country's relative strength in Ecosystem, Education & Implementation (2.4/10) and a thinner record in Constitutional & Legal Foundation (0.7/10). Kiribati is invited to engage with the Office of the Custodian to enable fuller scoring in future Editions.
The Custodian observes limited public information for this country at this Edition. The path forward is straightforward and voluntary: the designation of a National Authority under Article 8.1; a public response to the Annual Survey; the construction of the open-source legal-and-policy record from which the Index draws. The Charter holds no view, at this Edition, on the depth of the country's intentions; the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The complete IDSI Edition 0 (2026) report — methodology, sources, sub-indicators for all 194 States.
Get the full IDSI Edition 0 (2026) reportStates, civil-society organizations, and individuals may request a re-evaluation of any entry. The Custodian commits to a written response within thirty days.
Request a re-evaluation of Kiribati's entryThe Custodian’s open-source coverage of Kiribati is currently sparse. The links below offer search-based starting points; if you can point us to authoritative government sources for any of the five Pillars, please submit them via the re-evaluation form below.
Submissions are received under the standing Correction Notice protocol. Provide as much public-source detail as you can — the Custodian re-scores from open-source evidence, not from claim alone.
Standing Correction Notice — the State of Kiribati may request, in writing, the publication of a corrected entry within thirty days of any factual error. Edition 0 entries are derived from the open-source record only; nothing on this page is offered as a verdict, and the Initiative welcomes engagement that improves accuracy.