194 States surveyed against thirty-one sub-indicators across five pillars derived from the Charter. A non-ranking instrument, by design — and the most comprehensive picture of the data-sovereignty landscape published to date.
Edition 0 is issued from open-source data alone, prior to the first Charter signing cycle. It is presented as a recruitment instrument rather than a report card. Per-State entries are published for Tiers A, B, and C, with composite scores for Tiers A and B and pillar scores for Tier C.
Tiers A and B together — the 128 States carrying a composite score in Edition 0 — match the Custodian's pre-edition estimate of approximately 125 States set out in the Preliminary Coverage Assessment (May 2026), reproduced at Annex C of Edition 0.
Pillars are weighted equally at twenty percent each. Each sub-indicator is scored on a 0–10 rubric. The pillar score is the unweighted mean of its sub-indicators; the composite is the weighted mean of the five pillar scores expressed on a 0–100 scale.
Pillar IV — Sovereign Haven Infrastructure — sits notably below the other four. Pillar V — Ecosystem, Education, and Implementation — leads.
The modal band is 30–40 with 35 States; the secondary band is 50–60 with 32 States. No State scores below 10 or above 90 in Edition 0.
Edition 0 is the foundational survey. Supplement A tests the relationship between physical investment and legal-constitutional infrastructure across the world's top 100 data-center markets. Supplement B publishes explicit ranking tables — by composite, by pillar, and by region. Supplement C re-runs the Supplement A analysis with the United States excluded, to test outlier sensitivity and surface what the global picture looks like in the community ex-US.

Full methodology, four global charts, per-State entries for Tiers A, B, and C, and the standing Correction Notice protocol. The first complete picture of the world's data-sovereignty posture.

The headline finding: across the world's top 100 data-center markets, the correlation between physical investment and Pillar I (legal foundation) is r = 0.352 — moderate-to-weak. Compliance Gap and Haven Opportunity cohorts.

Explicit ranking tables of all 194 States by composite, by each of the five pillars, and by region. A working reference for analysts, investors, and policymakers.

Re-runs the Supplement A analysis with the United States removed. Pillar I correlation moves from r = 0.352 to r = 0.375 — every correlation strengthens with the outlier removed. Recalculated regional profile in which Europe becomes decisively the largest region in the global community ex-US.

The most comprehensive picture of the world's data-sovereignty posture available today. Everything the Initiative has published in Edition 0 — at a meaningful saving over individual prices.

All three analytical companions to Edition 0. For analysts who already hold the base edition or who only require the investment correlations, ranking tables, and outlier-sensitivity test.
Focused analyses of the world's most consequential data-sovereignty actors. Each Special Report extends Edition 0's open-source methodology with detailed treatment of constitutional, technical, identity, infrastructure, and ecosystem postures specific to that State or region.

People's Republic of China — comprehensive treatment of PIPL, DSL, CSL, the cyberspace administration, and Pillar IV (data-center) trajectory.

United States of America — sectoral privacy regime, state-level laws, federal cybersecurity strategy, and the world's largest data-center footprint.

Russian Federation — federal data localization regime, sovereign-internet program, and the country's distinct posture toward cross-border data flows.

Federative Republic of Brazil — LGPD implementation, ANPD's first cycle, the constitutional protection of data, and the South American data-haven question.

Republic of India — DPDP Act, Aadhaar, the Indian-stack identity model, and the country's emergence as a major data-center destination.

Republic of South Africa — POPIA, the Information Regulator, regional data-center leadership, and the African Union's data policy framework.

European Union — GDPR, the AI Act, Data Act, DGA, and the Digital Services regime. The most comprehensive supranational data-sovereignty architecture in the world.